Great or rubbish? Yaroslavl residents told what they think about working with neural networks

Excellent result or hack? Every second citizen still finds it difficult to assess the quality of work using neural networks. Representatives of the economically active population from Yaroslavl took part in the survey of the service for finding high-paying jobs SuperJob.

To the question “Is artificial intelligence for you more of a guarantee of high results and quality, or more of a defect and a hack?” 52% of Yaroslavl residents found it difficult to answer. “This is help. But we need to check”; “Artificial intelligence is imperfect”; “More like saving time,” “If this is creativity (literature, music, painting, etc.), then it’s hack work. If technologies require precision and are based on certain patterns and clear protocols, then AI is rather a benefit,” comment the respondents.

Citizens who consider work done using neural networks to be of higher quality are 23%. For 25% of respondents, artificial intelligence today is synonymous with defects and hackwork.

Men were more likely than women to leave negative reviews about neural networks (31% vs. 19%). Women had the most difficulty with the assessment (56%). Neural networks are most often protected by respondents under 34 years of age: 3 out of 10 called AI a guarantor of high results and quality of work.

Photo: ru.freepik.com